Volume 11 Issue 1
In This Issue
self-concept & social competence
insight and tolerance
isolation or loss
pressure to achieve
In spite of the difficulties, there are great joys. The siblings see all of it, sometimes more than we do. We have a lot to learn from our typical kids and we are learning to listen to them more and more. We have decided not to worry so much (OK, we know it is easier said than done) about the negative possibilities that can affect our kids. We’re learning to worry less and experience life more. As we seek to enjoy the little things in life and to learn from the difficult times that come our way, just maybe our attitude will shape the attitudes of our children. But most likely, it will be our children teaching us.
The Martindales live in Anoka Minnesota.
In order to successfully educate children who are deafblind, educators must use the best educational practices available. Assistive technology (AT) is one component of an educational program that can help deafblind children reach their full potential. A number of factors, however, often limit the use of these tools, including a lack of research data, unclear legal requirements, and limited knowledge about the benefits that AT can provide. Because of this, deafblind children are often denied the opportunity to access technology that could help them communicate, participate, socialize, and explore. All of these obstacles can be overcome, however, when all people involved in the lives of children who are deafblind are committed to the expansion of the use of assistive technology.
Children identified as deafblind have vision and hearing losses that impact learning, mobility, communication, and social and behavioral skills. In addition, cognitive or physical disabilities and medical problems are often present, creating challenges that can be overwhelming for teachers, therapists, counselors, and aides. It is unthinkable that these children with the most significant learning obstacles not be given close scrutiny to determine if AT might be necessary to meet their educational goals.
|Definitions IDEA defines an assistive technology device as “any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability.” An assistive technology service “means any service that directly assists a child with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device.”|
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a federal law that requires that all children with an IEP (individualized education program) must be considered for assistive technology. The law recognizes the value of AT and is designed to ensure that children with special needs have access to AT if it is needed to meet their educational goals. It seems logical to assume that children with the most significant obstacles to learning, including deafblind children, would be given thorough consideration. There is no literature to suggest, however, that all (or even a majority of) deafblind children are fortunate enough to be considered for AT on more than a cursory basis.
During IEP development, teachers are required to consider and document an array of factors related to a student’s educational program. These include (but are not limited to) the student’s present level of performance, learning characteristics, social and physical development, near-term goals, desired post-school outcomes, special and related services, transportation, and accommodations. Considering the litany of factors to consider, it’s easy to see how AT might be overlooked.
It is important to note a couple of points. First, the ultimate goal for educators is not to acquire a device for a particular child, but rather to explore which devices and services are appropriate to allow participation and to meet educational goals. Second, increasing the awareness of AT should not lessen, but rather complement the value of other interventions and therapies such as the use of intervenors, vision assessments, and person-centered planning. Finally, AT should assume a prominent place in professional discussion about promising practices. The reality is that when AT is overlooked as a service, the negative consequences are the greatest for deafblind children.
Listed below are some of the obstacles that inhibit the acquisition and use of AT and suggested actions to overcome the obstacles. While these problems are complicated and the responses simplistic, it is an attempt to further a dialogue about assistive technology and deafblindness.
1. There is a lack of reliable data about AT and its use with deafblind children.
Very little data is available about the use and effectiveness of assistive technology for students who are deafblind. If there were data suggesting that, in general, AT is not being used with deafblind children, then we would need to ask why and take action to correct the situation.
Response: There is an obvious need to gather qualitative and quantitative data on the consideration process for and the acquisition, use, and effectiveness of AT for deafblind students so that the field can make decisions about how to best ensure that all of these children are considered consistently and fairly. As an initial step, state deafblind projects should be encouraged to collect and share data on the use of AT by students in their census. It is feasible to determine how many students are using AT, what kind is being used, and whether it is included on the IEP. The resulting data could help clarify a response.
2. Deafblind advocacy groups have not made assistive technology for deafblind students a priority.
Assistive technology has not received the same focus of attention by the deafblind community as other issues have. Etiology, identification, transition, inclusion, and evaluation are often explored and debated, but AT remains an ancillary topic. Despite the fact that communication development is strongly emphasized (and rightly so), there has not been enough attention given to the augmentation of communication via technology.
Response: Family and professional advocacy groups, both state and federal, should work to promote the use of assistive technology to achieve educational goals. State deafblind project personnel should include individuals knowledgeable about assistive technology resources in their states and should encourage schools to consider AT for deafblind children.
3. Existing best practices in the field of AT are not being implemented or effectively promoted for deafblind children.
Existing professional standards and practice recommendations are available to help implement assistive technology services for children with all types of disabilities. There is no need for duplicate forms or guidelines for children with deafblindness.
Response: The Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI), http://www.wati.org, and the Georgia Project for Assistive Technology, http://www.gpat.org/, have excellent AT assessment protocols available for use. These resources, along with policy frameworks such as the Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology (QIAT), http://www.qiat.org, and the Assistive Technology Policy Checklist, http://natri.uky.edu/resources/reports/cheklst.html, need to be disseminated and put into practice in schools attended by deafblind children.
4. The AT provisions in IDEA are not enforced.
IDEA states that IEP teams must consider whether a child requires assistive technology devices and services but does not define the term “consider.” If an IEP team decides that no AT is required for a particular student, the decision is typically not justified or explained.
Response: Advocacy groups should lobby federal legislators to amend the AT provisions within IDEA to define the phrase “must be considered.” IEPs must explain how a student was considered for AT and why AT was not required if that was the determination. State compliance boards should be encouraged to emphasize the importance of AT as a component of the IEP.
5. Parents of children who are deafblind have not made AT a priority when advocating for services.
Historically, the impetus for meaningful change in policy and practice in the field of disabilities has come from parents who have organized to testify and lobby on behalf of their children.
Response: Parents of children who are deafblind could connect with other disability groups to advocate and lobby to ensure that deafblind children receive AT consideration and benefits. Existing deafblind parent support groups could create position papers, call local legislators, and connect with local parent training and information centers to promote AT awareness in their communities.
Beginning during preschool and continuing throughout the school years, computer activities may be used to promote language acquisition and communication development in children who are deafblind. They may be used to support children’s communicative behaviors and interactions; to improve their understanding of symbols, pictures, and words; and to promote the development of formal written language.
A child’s physical, sensory, and cognitive abilities are important considerations for the design of computer activities. Computer input and output methods should be based on an assessment of a child’s physical and sensory abilities. The type and content of activities should generally be determined by a child’s cognitive abilities as well as by the educational objectives. An assistive technology evaluation to determine specific technology solutions for an individual child should be performed by someone who is both familiar with the unique needs of deafblind children and knowledgeable about current technology.
Teaching suggestions and examples of successful computer activities used with children in the Deafblind Program at Perkins School for the Blind will be shared here. Many other software programs and hardware solutions are also appropriate for children who are deafblind, and new technologies are continually being developed. A single software program can address multiple areas of the curriculum and can benefit children of different ages and abilities depending on how it is used with an individual child. Some programs are designed specifically to support one type of activity such as cause and effect or picture matching. Others are limited only by the creativity of the individual designing the activity.
Effective computer activities designed to support communication include:
Children who have some usable vision can benefit by participating in these activities. Those who are totally deafblind can be introduced to the computer only after acquiring enough language and knowledge of braille to successfully operate a refreshable braille display for computer access.
Children who demonstrate an ability to visually attend for short periods of time can be introduced to the computer for activities that teach the concept of cause and effect. It is important that the selected software program draws the child’s visual attention immediately to the screen and provides direct feedback for his or her actions. A monitor with a built-in touch screen makes it possible for a child to establish a direct link between an action and the resulting activity that appears on the screen. The child should be seated in front of the monitor in an optimal position for viewing the screen at eye level. An adjustable chair or table should be used if necessary. Extraneous equipment, such as the keyboard and mouse, should be moved out of reach. High-quality amplified computer speakers can be used to provide auditory feedback that enhances the experience.
A teacher introduces the activity by first modeling the action of touching the screen, then by providing hand-under-hand assistance to the child if necessary. Children learn that they can produce an effect by touching the screen because they receive immediate reinforcement in the form of a change in a pattern, sound, or animation. Once a child has demonstrated an understanding of the relationship between cause and effect using a touch screen, an indirect access tool is introduced. This is usually in the form of a switch or mouse button. However, some children need to take smaller steps away from direct touch by first using a handheld tool such as a stylus or a pointer made from thermoplastic material.
Software programs that utilize a single switch or mouse click and present instant feedback in the form of bold colored patterns displayed on a solid or uncluttered background and accompanied by distinct sounds are preferred. Ideally, programs should present images and information in a consistent and predictable location. The possibility of a child’s missing the visual reward is reduced if he or she can anticipate the appearance of a particular graphic or animation in a specific location on the screen. As children learn where to look for an action, they can have more meaningful and successful interactions with the computer.
An example of a program that can be used for cause-and-effect activities is SwitchIt! Suite (IntelliTools). This suite provides options for changing images, colors, and the number of switch activations needed before an animated reward is presented, and it consists of four separate programs with display options ranging from simple patterns with large, bold components to complex fine-line drawings. The complexity and number of graphics presented on the screen at one time can gradually be increased as a child demonstrates understanding of an activity and the ability to visually discriminate the content. Other programs are Creature Antics (Laureate), which presents slightly more complex animated creature characters against a solid black background, and Eensy and Friends (Don Johnston), which has large, colorful graphics and stable background images, for use when a child is ready to process an increased number of visual variables as part of an activity.
Successful early computer experiences build a foundation for more complex interactions as activities transition from random cause-and-effect exercises to early language development activities such as symbol recognition, matching, choice making, requesting, and labeling.
Symbol recognition. One activity to help children learn how to use symbols for communication involves matching images of symbols displayed on a computer screen to the same symbols displayed on a card. Using a screen-capture utility, screen images can be duplicated, printed on cards, and laminated. Then, as an image appears on the screen, a teacher presents a card with the matching image to the child. A strip of Velcro placed on the front of the monitor allows the symbol to be placed next to the screen, leaving the teacher’s hands free for signing. Over time, as a child’s recognition of symbols increases, several cards are presented at one time and the child is encouraged to choose favorite programs or patterns. These types of interactions promote the use of language as the child makes requests or indicates preferences and the teacher responds immediately with a combination of signs, symbols, and the requested computer animations.
Labeling and matching. Once a child can demonstrate an ability to discriminate and recognize pictures (photographs, line drawings, or graphical symbols), computer activities can be expanded to include labeling and matching. Many educational software programs used for this purpose have appropriate content but are inaccessible to children with severe visual impairments. However, some programs allow easy customization of lessons by combining sounds, picture communication symbols, computer graphics, digital images, movies, and text in a format that is appropriate for each child. Meaningful language-based activities can be created with multimedia authoring programs found in many elementary schools such as HyperStudio (Sunburst) or IntelliPics Studio (IntelliTools).
The program Stickybear Opposites Deluxe (Optimum Resource, Inc.) uses clear bold animated graphics to illustrate basic concepts such as on/off, up/down, in/out, and big/small, and provides multiple opportunities to support language development by talking or signing about the animation as it plays out on the screen. Words Around Me (Riverdeep/Edmark) focuses on developing common vocabulary by using photographs and drawings for lessons in labeling, matching, and categorizing. The teacher facilitates interaction with the program by signing as the pictures are identified and labeled and as directions for matching are given in digitized speech.
Customized computer activities for picture matching utilize images representing the features of a child’s daily routine or photographs of family members and classmates. Initially, the child is asked to find two similar images on the screen and “drag” them together make a match. At a higher level, the child is required to look away from the screen and locate the match on an alternative keyboard such as the IntelliKeys keyboard (IntelliTools). OverlayMaker (IntelliTools) can be used to create keyboard overlays appropriate for a child’s visual and cognitive abilities.
As a child’s language abilities develop, computer activities can be used for storytelling and to teach reading and writing. Initially, programs are used that encourage the child to use pictures and photographs for communication and self-expression.
Children who recognize and understand photographs particularly enjoy computer activities that integrate photographs of themselves and their classmates. With IntelliPics Studio, a teacher and child work together to create experience stories about field trips, special events, and classroom activities. They illustrate events using a picture of the child, classmates, and other aspects of an experience that appear on palettes as clip art choices and backgrounds within the program. The child and teacher discuss the event through the selection and placement of these images. Through manipulation of his own image, the child expresses himself even when he does not have the specific vocabulary to do so. The teacher takes advantage of this opportunity to teach formal language by using signs, speech, or written words that describe the child’s actions. He or she provides additional language instruction by using overlays on the IntelliKeys keyboard. The child selects keys containing words or phrases on the overlay to label pictures or create simple sentences.
Children can write sentences with picture support using a program such as Clicker 4 (Crick Software), a word processor that integrates the Mayer-Johnson Picture Communication Symbols with text. On-screen grids containing pictures and words based on a child’s particular language abilities facilitate sentence formation. A teacher discusses an event with the child by asking questions and encouraging written self-expression by the selection of words and symbols from the grids. The document is printed and added to a notebook that serves as a journal of the child’s experiences for later review, further discussion, or sharing with others.
As written language develops, the child types words on a keyboard and the use of symbols and grids is decreased. An IntelliKeys keyboard is used with a large-print alphabet in a QWERTY layout to facilitate eventual transition to a standard computer keyboard. Initially, the child uses the on-screen grids as a model for word choices or sentence structure and merely copies the text. Later, the child is challenged to recall spelling words from memory or type them with fingerspelling help from the teacher. The child is motivated to write experience stories, letters to others, and lists for shopping or cooking. The teacher encourages writing development by providing assistance with vocabulary and language.
The interaction between children and teachers during computer time is very valuable for language acquisition and development. There is a careful balance between teaching a child to use the computer and teaching a child language using a computer. When that balance is achieved, the computer can be a very powerful tool for learning and using language.
The keyboard and mouse generally provide the primary computer input. These devices can serve as barriers for many deafblind children because of visual or physical limitations, but simple adaptations are possible. Children may need to have a particular set of skills before some of these adaptations can be used. In some instances, these skills can be taught as the adaptation is introduced. In other cases, a foundation must be in place before the skills that the adaptation requires can be taught. Introduction of complex devices before a child demonstrates understanding of specific concepts or has the required motor skills can result in unnecessary failure and even rejection of the technology. The development of important foundations supports a child’s readiness for the use of more sophisticated technologies and ultimately determines their effectiveness.
Simple modifications for the mouse:
Specialized hardware as a replacement for the mouse:
Add-on software modifications for the mouse or mouse replacement:
Simple modifications for the keyboard:
Specialized hardware as a replacement for the standard keyboard:
Add-on software modifications for the keyboard:
Visual output is a major component of most computer activities for children. Software programs contain colorful graphics and animation, with integrated sounds, digitized speech, or music. Inability to see graphics or hear sounds may limit but does not always have to prevent a child’s use of a software program.
Simple modifications for the screen:
Specialized modifications for the screen:
Modifications for sound output:
P.O. Box 68
Henderson, MN 56044
(Assistive technology database)
8630 Fenton Street, Suite 930
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Assistive Technology Industry
(Organization of manufacturers and providers of assistive technology devices and services)
401 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, IL 60611-4267
(Switches, switch interfaces)
1081 10th Ave. S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414
(Screen magnification software)
P.O. Box 669
Manchester Center, VT 05255
Alva Access Group, Inc.
(Braille displays, notetakers, and screen readers)
436 14th St., Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
50 116th Ave S.E., Suite 211
Bellevue, WA 98004
Don Johnston Incorporated
(Switches, switch interfaces, Eensy & Friends, On A Green Bus, A Day at Play)
26799 West Commerce Drive
Volo, IL 60073
(Touch Window, Words Around Me,
Bailey’s Book House, Millie’s Math House)
500 Redwood Blvd.
Novato, CA 94947
(KidPix Studio, Stickybear Opposites Deluxe, general educational software and hardware)
1550 Executive Drive
Elgin, IL 60123
(Braille notetakers, displays, and embossers; screen magnification software)
11800 31st Court N.
St. Petersburg, FL 33716-1805
(IntelliKeys, IntelliPics Studio, Overlay Maker, SwitchIt! Suite)
1720 Corporate Circle
Petaluma, CA 94954
Laureate Learning Systems,
(Creature Antics, Creature Capers)
110 East Spring Street
Winooski, VT 05404-1898
(Mayer-Johnson Picture Communication Symbols)
P.O. Box 1579
Solana Beach, CA 92075
R. J. Cooper &
(Magic Arm switch mount, cause-and-effect software)
27601 Forbes Rd., Suite 39
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
(Old Mac’s Farm)
4300 Stine Road, Suite 401
Bakersfield, CA 93309
1550 Executive Drive
Elgin, IL 60123
Switch In Time
(Free switch accessible software for Macintosh, Scan’n Read, KidBook)
172 Harvard Road
Littleton, MA 01460
(Touch screens: add-on and built-in)
25530 Avenue Stanford, Suite 201
Valencia, CA 91355-1131
Deaf-Blind Perspectives would like to begin a recurring “Research Update” section consisting of short announcements related to research in deaf-blindness. Researchers and other interested individuals or agencies may use this column to share information about new, ongoing, or recently completed research projects. We are interested in information from both the United States and international sources. Examples of the types of announcements that may be posted include:
We hope that people will be interested in contributing to this column and that it will serve as a focused place within Deaf-Blind Perspectives where people can look for information about research. If you are interested in contributing an announcement or have questions, contact:
345 N. Monmouth Ave.
Monmouth, OR 97361
The Persons Aging with Hearing & Vision Loss Project is looking for individuals over the age of 55 to participate in a three-to-five-year study exploring ways to improve employment and community integration outcomes for persons who are deaf or blind and who are experiencing a secondary onset of vision or hearing loss as a result of aging. Although the project focuses on individuals who acquired one loss before the age of 55 and the second loss after the age of 55, all persons over 55 with both lossesare eligible to participate. Collaborating in this project are the Mississippi State University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) on Blindness and Low Vision, the Helen Keller National Center, and the RRTC on Persons Who Are Hard of Hearing or Late Deafened at National University in San Diego.
For more information or for a study group application, contact:
B. J. LeJeune, Principle
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision
Mississippi State University
P.O. Box 6189
Mississippi State, MS 39762
Mesch, Johanna (2001). Tactile Sign Language: Turn Taking and Question in Signed Conversations of Deaf-Blind People. Hamburg: Signum. (International Studies on Sign Language and Communication of the Deaf, Vol. 38). This is an English translation of a dissertation written in Swedish in 1998.
On July 28, the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services made available grant applications for research validation and implementation projects for children who are deaf-blind. A maximum of three grants will be awarded in amounts of up to $205,000 per year for periods of up to five years. The application deadline was August 27. An announcement of the grant awards will be made in the Winter 2003/2004 issue of Deaf-Blind Perspectives.
About 400 people from 32 states and 7 foreign countries attended the 6th International CHARGE Syndrome Conference this summer in Cleveland, Ohio. The majority of participants were family members of a child with CHARGE Syndrome. In addition to a rich and varied schedule of presentations and events, the conference also included a day camp for children with CHARGE and their siblings.
The agenda featured sessions that focused on research, medical issues, and education. Presenters included experts from the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, France, Norway, and the United States. Many of the presentations revisited and updated issues that have been addressed at past conferences including research into the genetic causes of CHARGE, endocrinology, puberty, toileting, sleep problems, feeding issues, hearing, vision, and communication. This year, educational issues such as intervenors, curriculum access, teaching strategies, and transition were also strongly emphasized. A few sessions focused on young adults with CHARGE and discussed transition planning and independent living. A highlight of the conference was a panel of adults with CHARGE Syndrome who shared their stories and experiences and answered questions from families in the audience.
Another conference highlight was the Behavior Symposium. Through the efforts of Tim Hartshorne and with financial support from Central Michigan University, NTAC, and the Helen Keller National Center, a specific Behavior Symposium was included for the first time at a CHARGE Syndrome Conference. Researchers, educators, and families gathered to discuss the challenging behaviors exhibited by children with CHARGE Syndrome.
All of the presenters agreed that there is a need for further research and collaborative work. Hopefully, the Behavior Symposium will become a regular feature of the CHARGE conference.
There were many opportunities for families to interact with one another. Informal meetings at meals, at the pool, and in the elevator offered a chance for people to connect and compare experiences. Social events included a carnival and silent auction. Although nothing compares with actually attending the conference, the sessions were recorded and most presenters submitted handouts. Both the videotapes and the conference proceedings are available from:
CHARGE Syndrome Foundation, Inc.
2004 Parkade Boulevard
Columbia, MO 65202-3121
800-442-7604 or 573-499-4694
Living With CHARGE: Assessment, Prevention, and Intervention of Challenging Behavior - van Dijk, Jan & de Kort, Arno. Aap Noot Muis Educainment, 2003.
This is an interactive CD-ROM on the behavior problems that are often associated with CHARGE Syndrome. Four children ranging in age from 15 months to 12 years and who exhibit stereotypical behavior, noncompliance, aggression, or self-injury are discussed. Through the use of video clips, challenging behaviors and the reactions of service providers are demonstrated. By means of questions and answers, the viewer is taken through a process of analyzing behaviors. The analysis leads to recommendations for prevention and intervention. The use of cochlear implants to prevent problem behaviors in some children is also addressed. To order, send a check for $35.00 to Mr. Joe Franken, 4619 Spyglass Drive, Dallas, TX 75287. Indicate “CHARGE” on the check.
Touching Lives: Portraits of Deaf-Blind People (Video, 56:30 minutes) - Gordon, Myles & Hajjar, Susan.
Produced over a four-year period, Touching Lives focuses on the lives, trials, and triumphs of people who are deaf-blind. The goal of the video is to raise awareness about deaf-blindness and to assist deaf-blind people in their struggle to improve the quality of their lives. It is narrated by Susan Hajjar, a hearing-sighted woman with three deaf-blind siblings and a noted advocate for the rights of deaf-blind people and co-founder of Boston’s Deaf-Blind Contact Center. To order send a check for $35.00 made out to The Center for Independent Documentary and mail to: Myles Gordon, c/o Touching Lives, 54 McCarthy Rd., Newton, MA 02459. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Art Beyond Sight: A Resource Guide to Art, Creativity, and Visual Impairment - Axel Elisabeth Salzhauer & Levent, Nina Sobol (Eds.). New York: Art Education for the Blind, Inc., & AFB Press, 2003.
American Foundation for the Blind and
Art Education for the Blind have joined together to co-publish this resource
book that provides information on all aspects of exploring art and creativity
by people who are blind or visually impaired. This illustrated manual is the
result of a decade-long international collaboration among researchers, art
educators, teachers of visually impaired students, psychologists, museum
professionals, and blind and sighted art enthusiasts. Includes a section of
reproducible pages for classroom or workshop activities. Cost: $69.95.
Available from AFB Press. Phone: 800-232-3044. E-mail:
Assistive Technology Expo
Assistive Technology Expos will be held on December 2 (Monroeville), December 3 (State College), and December 4 (King of Prussia). Manufacturers, Intermediate Unit Assistive Technology staff, and Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network staff (including deafblind project staff) will be available to demonstrate equipment, answer questions, and assist participants in finding solutions to assistive technology needs. Brochure and registration information may be found at ftp://ftp.pattan.k12.pa.us/pattan/Flyers03/Expo03.pdf. There is no fee. Parents of children and youth who are deaf-blind are encouraged to contact Nancy Lehr at 800-360-7282, ext. 3115, if interested in setting up a time to explore the Expo with a staff member of the deafblind project.
Getting in Touch with Literacy
December 4-7, 2003
Vancouver, British Columbia
This conference addresses issues related to literacy for individuals with visual impairments at all age and literacy levels. It is anticipated that presentations will include information on reading and writing in braille, use of assistive technology, use of a variety of literacy tools, and other relevant topics.
Cay Holbrook (co-chair)
University of British Columbia
CSUN’s 19th Annual
International Conference on Technology and Persons with Disabilities
March 15–20, 2004
Sponsored by Center on Disabilities, California State University, Northridge.
20th Annual PACRIM Conference on
March 29–30, 2004
The theme of the 2004 Pacific Rim Conference on Disabilities, “Promises to Keep, Futures to Seek” reflects on the promises and goals made and the opportunities created for persons with disabilities. It is sponsored by the Center on Disability Studies, University Center for Excellence, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Sibling Support Project of the Arc of the United States
The Sibling Support Project is a national project dedicated to the concerns of the brothers and sisters of people with special health, developmental, and mental health concerns. The project specializes in providing workshops on family issues. It also sponsors email discussion groups for and about brothers and sisters of people with special health, developmental, and emotional needs. Both SibKids (for younger brothers and sisters) and SibNet (for older siblings) allow brothers and sisters an opportunity to connect with their peers from around the world. For more information visit the Web site at www.thearc.org/siblingsupport or contact:
Don Meyer, Director
6512 23rd Ave NW, #213
Seattle, WA 98117
United States & Canada Adopt New Braille Terminology
The Braille Authority of North America (BANA) announces a change in terminology to what has been traditionally known as “grade 1” and “grade 2” braille. These categories will now be referred to as “uncontracted” and “contracted” braille respectively. The change is being made at the request of many in the blindness field. People often confuse grades of braille with first and second grades in elementary school. BANA believes that the change to more accurately descriptive language will increase awareness and improve the overall understanding of how braille is learned, read, written, and transcribed. BANA Web site: http://www.brailleauthority.org.
345 N. Monmouth Ave.
Monmouth, OR 97361